Search found 5 matches

Go to advanced search

by eiffeltower
Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:42 am
Forum: General
Topic: Gems overrated
Replies: 5
Views: 5557

Re: Gems overrated

Alex, I disagree. I think that rating an item level 232 more than an item level 245 just because they 232 has 2 gem slots is completely incorrect. The item level 232 was specifically designed with 2 slots, whereas the item level 245 does not need gems to be better than the previous one. What I can s...
by eiffeltower
Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:44 am
Forum: General
Topic: Gems overrated
Replies: 5
Views: 5557

Re: Gems overrated

bump for a reply on items at different ilevels.
by eiffeltower
Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:22 am
Forum: General
Topic: Gems overrated
Replies: 5
Views: 5557

Re: Gems overrated

Hi there and thanks for your reply. I agree with your examples, but there you compare items of the same iLevel - the problem is that currently, a LOWER item level, with more sockets, will always be better than an item from the ilevel just above, with no sockets, and this does not match real gear pro...
by eiffeltower
Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:34 am
Forum: Items
Topic: Belt ilvl-gear score fix
Replies: 5
Views: 4540

Re: Belt ilvl-gear score fix

I agree and made a post about it. Because gems are calculated AFTER the overall item score, then we end up having items from an inferior level rated higher just because they are socketed.

This is wrong/unrelfective of game progression, especially for the extra socket profession.
by eiffeltower
Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:23 am
Forum: General
Topic: Gems overrated
Replies: 5
Views: 5557

Gems overrated

Note: previous topic was deleted as it mentionned JC gems being the problem. After looking into this, I found it wasnt just their gems, just that items with more gem slots will in the end give much more gear score... Hey guys.... Ive noticed some weird stuff with gems and cannot find answers on the...

Go to advanced search